Our staff here has spent countless hours redesigning and updating our paper version—and IT LOOKS GREAT! If you do not currently receive our News Journal, we encourage you to sign up—the first year for new subscribers is FREE. Sign up now! →
Additionally we are now publishing an electronic version to read on your computer, smart phone or tablet. We are giving the first few months of the electronic version away to everyone. Get them on our homepage. →
Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu arrived in London on Monday for two days of
meetings with British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and US Mideast mediator
George Mitchell, making clear that he will not allow anyone to question
Israel's sovereignty over Jerusalem. The US and Israel have been wrangling for
weeks about the nature of a settlement freeze that US President Barack Obama
called for in the early days of his presidency, and which the Palestinians have
now made a condition for restarting negotiations.
- The Jerusalem Post
South Korean prosecutors told a Seoul court on Monday they wanted a four-year
prison term for disgraced scientist Hwang Woo-suk, whose research team has been
linked to major fraud in its once-celebrated stem cell studies.
The 57-year-old Hwang, touted as a global stem cell pioneer and treated as a
national hero, was indicted in 2006 on charges of embezzling 2 billion won
(then $2 million) of research funds from two domestic companies using
fabricated reports.
- The Korea Times
Laura Ling and Euna Lee, the two American journalists released after nearly five
months in North Korean custody, have been widely portrayed at home as victims of
unduly harsh punishment by a repressive government for simply doing their job.
But...in South Korea, human rights advocates, bloggers and Christian pastors
are accusing them of needlessly endangering the very people they tried to
cover: North Korean refugees and the activists who help them.
- The New York Times
In recent years, astonishing technological developments have pushed the frontiers of humanity toward a far-reaching transformation that promises in the very near future to redefine what it means to be human.
As a result, new modes of perception between things visible and invisible are expected to challenge the Church in ways that are unprecedented. The destiny of each individual—as well as the future of their family will depend on the knowledge of this new paradigm and their preparedness to face it head on
This offer will expire in 7 days.
Texas high schools will be offering Bible literacy classes this fall,
according to a 2007 Texas law now officially going into effect. As
expected, plenty of people are criticizing Texas for weakening the
Church-State boundary. Others, though, laud the law for working
to brick in an essential part of high schoolers' education.
In 2007, Texas passed House Bill 1287, which requires that Texas public high
schools offer "elective courses on the Bible's Hebrew Scriptures (Old
Testament) and New Testament and their impact on the history and literature of
Western civilization." Problems with funding and training put the law on
hold for two years, but this year the classes will be available all over the
state. The law stipulates that the lessons are to be taught objectively, in an
academic manner and should neither promote nor disparage religion. Instead,
they should "teach students knowledge of biblical content, characters,
poetry, and narratives that are prerequisites to understanding contemporary
society and culture." Teachers have to get a special certification that
qualifies them to teach the course, lest the class become a daily devotional
time.
School districts have some flexibility about how to implement the law in
their own high schools. Wylie High School will offer a Bible literacy class
using a textbook approved by the Texas Education Agency. Abilene Independent
School District, though, will simply include Bible literacy information in
other classes on literature or history.
Social studies teacher Jennifer Kendrick taught a Bible literacy course at New
Braunfels High School three years ago, and 25 students have signed up for it
this year.
"We cover comparative religion and study the archetypes in the Bible, as
well as its influence on literature and Western
civilization," Kendrick said. "One unit talks about the books of
the Bible and the other is more of a comparison of other religions," and
their history, she said.
"This is not Christianity 101," said Eric Thaxton, an English teacher
who will be teaching the class at Wylie High School. "This is the Bible and
its influence. If someone in the class is not a Christian, I hope they get the
same out of it as everyone else."
Plenty of people have already accused Texas of failing to recognize the
separation of Church and State over this law. Some have blamed Texas with
one-upping the Taliban, and others have insisted that education on the Bible
should be relegated to the Sunday School classroom. Some parents
are concerned their kids will be taught that the Bible is true. Others
fear the opposite, that their kids will be taught that the Bible
stories are merely mythology. There is always the risk that
teachers will push their agendas, whichever way they might
lean. However, as long as schools stick to the rules and
teach the Bible objectively, students will simply learn more about
the Bible and be free to draw their own religious and spiritual
conclusions about its contents.
Even completely secular educators, though, can argue that Texas is in the
right. This can be seen simply from a quick look at Shakespeare.
Shakespeare and the Bible:
Shakespeare helped create the English language. We teach Shakespeare to
unappreciative school children because his works offer excellent literature,
and his stories are entertaining to boot. A knowledge of Shakespeare is
useful toward a good education for another reason; a massive number
of common idioms and phrases have come to the world through his plays.
The same is true of the Bible. The Bible gives us poetry and drama, legal
documents, history, and romance, and is arguable the world's most excellent
collection of literature, ancient or otherwise. And not only are the Bible
stories worthy reads in themselves, but a massive number of common idioms and
sayings come to us from the Bible. In fact, a knowledge of the Bible is vital
for understanding much of Western literature, because allusions to the Bible
pop up constantly. We don't only find the Bible in obvious places like
Paradise Lost by John Milton, but in the writings of John Steinbeck
and O. Henry, Mark Twain and William Faulkner. Biblical references pervade
Western literature.
In fact, Shakespeare himself alludes to the Bible so regularly that some folks
have speculated he was one of the scholars that translated the King James
Version. The story of Cain and Abel alone shows up in Shakespeare 25 times, and
a conservative estimate of Shakespeare's biblical allusions runs about 1200 in
number.
Shakespeare also refers to Greek and Roman mythology a great
deal. Frankly, students who are ignorant of Greek and Roman myths
will be hard pressed to understand many of Shakespeare's allusions.
Nobody would question a course on Greek mythology in a public school
classroom. Yet, Shakespeare used the Bible with relish. The Bible
influenced all of Western history and law, literature and society far
more than even the Greeks.
And that's the point. Not only is it okay that the Bible be taught in public schools, but it is vital if students are to have a good understanding of Western literature and culture. People should not be attacking public schools for offering classes on the Bible. They should be upset if schools fail to offer classes on Bible literacy. Leaving it out for fear of breaking the sacred Church and State barrier is detrimental to the basic education of our students.
Food is always big news. From the dangers of a high-McDonald's lifestyle to
the potential cancer-fighting benefits of chocolate, people are always
interested in food. In those parts of the world where people don't necessarily
eat every day, a steady food supply is serious business. At the same time,
researchers and scientists have developed some bizarre methods for producing
food, and the products may or may not be as great as their advertisers
claim.
Test Tube Meat:
CNN reports that research group New Harvest has been working on creating
"meat" in a laboratory. In an effort to get away from the hassles of
animal production, with the space and grain requirements, New Harvest
researchers are growing their protein-rich products in steel
vats. New Harvest also claims its lab-made meat comes
free of the diseases that can be found on normal animal farms.
The process does not require anything exotic like big computers recombining
atoms. Nature is still used, after a fashion. The eggs of cows or pigs are
collected from a local slaughterhouse. Those eggs are fertilized and the
resulting embryos are put in a nutrient solution where they can grow as big and
strong as embryos can without a uterus involved. The in-vitro meat can't replace
a chicken leg or steak, but it can work as ground meat, sausages or chicken
nuggets.
"Cultured meat would have a lot of advantages," said Jason Matheny of
New Harvest. "We could precisely control the amount of fat in meat. We
could make ground beef with an ideal fatty acid ratio -- a hamburger that
prevents heart attacks instead of causing them."
Environmentalists and animal rights groups are excited about the prospect of
moving the world's meat supplies from the stockyard to the lab. They visualize
a world with no more cramped chicken runs packed with birds that
are pumped full of hormones and antibiotics. They imagine rainforests safe
from bulldozers because new fields are not needed to grow crops to feed cattle.
One environmental scientist was less than impressed with the plan, however,
commenting on the CNN article:
"Animal cells do not manufacture protein out of wishes and moonbeams. There will be a feedstock, likely based mostly on soy and corn to balance the protein content just like animal feed today. It will be heavily chemically processed to break it down into a form muscle cells can use. There will be waste from this process which will be chemically similar to the waste produced by animal digestion. The metabolic processes of the tank meat will also produce waste which will be essentially identical to the waste produced by metabolism in an intact animal."
In other words, this isn't a food-from-nothing effort. There will still be feed and waste issues to deal with. We cannot grow in-vitro burgers "in a cup" in space for 700 years while WALL-E stacks our garbage into skyscrapers, fun as that sounds. At the same time, it would seem that, pound for pound, growing embryos would require less feed and would emit less waste than a steer that eats for half a year before it's slaughtered.
Either way, there is something perverse about eating animal
embryos, even coated with sweet and sour sauce. It might not be Soylent Green,
but it will still take a long time to convince consumers that in-vitro is all
good to eat.
Organic Continues To Thrive:
Test tube chicken nuggets are not the only option. There are other alternatives
to hormone-filled chickens squished in cages. As the economy has slowed down,
folks have been returning to their own backyards. People with a few acres are
taking advantage of their land to let a bullock or two forage during the
summer. Gardens grown with heirloom seeds and old-fashioned manure can be
guaranteed free of chemicals and genetically modified vegetables. A few happy
chickens wandering around the yard not only eat bugs, and poop out natural
fertilizer, but they offer hormone-free eggs and even an occasional healthy
supper of chicken and dumplings. Feathers are messy, but we all make trades in
life.
Organic farms have flourished in recent decades as people shy away from the
hormones and chemicals and genetically modified produce that have overtaken
supermarket shelves. Even in the cities, rooftop and vacant lot gardens have
cropped up. A good supply of tomatoes or basil can be gathered from potted
plants on a balcony, and they taste miles better than the ones from the
store.
Future Famine?
In Revelation 6:5-6, the Bible speaks of a time when a simple measure
of wheat will cost an entire day's wages. Famines are not new, and there will
be some terrible ones in the future. The problem is not lack of resources or
overpopulation, however. The majority of famines on earth are man-made. The
horrible economic conditions of the future will be caused by mismanagement and
corrupt government rather than a lack of land or water, or even
of a shortage of embryonic-beef burgers.
The Christian's Famine Today:
Too many Christians today suffer from malnourishment; we are living in
famine conditions but the famine has nothing to do with food. Our famine is
like the one that Amos spoke of:
"The days are coming," declares the Sovereign LORD, "when I will send a famine through the land - not a famine of food or a thirst for water, but a famine of hearing the words of the LORD." - Amos 8:11
Let's put as much effort into feeding ourselves with the Word of God as we do putting supper (with or without in-vitro burgers) on the table. After all, man does not live by bread alone.
Koinonia Institute is dedicated to training and equipping the serious Christian to sojourn in today’s world.
This unique international membership offers education, insight and community for the serious believer. Pray about joining us.
We solicit your prayers and support of this ministry. God Bless.
This eNews is a reader supported ministry. If you would like to help support this effort, you can make your contribution here.
If you received this email from a friend, you can get a FREE subscription by signing up at the K-House web site.
You received this email by request from Koinonia House.
Web site: http://www.khouse.org/
Online Store: http://store.khouse.org/
eNews: http://www.khouse.org/email/eNews_Subscription/
Manage Your Subscription: http://www.khouse.org/lists/